四川：2022级10只新生大熊猫首次集体亮相******
中新网成都1月18日电 (记者 安源)记者18日从中国大熊猫保护研究中心获悉，在春节即将来临之际该中心在卧龙神树坪基地举办2022级大熊猫宝宝首次集体亮相活动，10只活泼可爱、萌态可掬的大熊猫宝宝以特别的方式向全国人民送上最“萌”新春祝福。这是中国大熊猫保护研究中心注重优生优育，优化饲养繁育，推进大熊猫饲养标准化管理取得的成果之一，进一步夯实了大熊猫保护研究工作根基。
亮相现场。 李传有 摄在亮相现场，红色的灯笼、中国结挂在枝头，喜庆的“福”字点缀树梢，可爱的小兔子玩偶、“2023”氛围装饰、“新年礼物盒”错落有致地摆放在草地上，营造了浓浓的新年氛围。虽是寒冬腊月，气温零下，但天公作美，暖阳洒落，再配上“中国年”特有的元素，让亮相现场喜气洋洋、生机勃勃。奶爸奶妈们抱着一只只大熊猫宝宝走入亮相现场，齐声向全国人民拜年，祝福大家新年快乐，兔年大吉。随后在奶爸奶妈们的照看下，大熊猫宝宝们开始“自由活动”，有的爬上树好奇打量中国结，有的抱着兔子玩偶打滚玩耍，有的推倒新年装置不停嗅闻，也有黏人的宝宝抱着饲养员的大腿撒娇，还有一些“熊孩子”四处乱窜，和奶爸奶妈玩“捉猫”游戏，尽情释放着它们活泼爱玩的天性。大熊猫宝宝们玩得不亦乐乎，奶爸奶妈们也是忙得不亦乐乎。
据介绍，2022年，中国大熊猫保护研究中心共成功繁殖存活8胎13仔。今年6月21日大熊猫“博斯”产下一对双胞胎，拉开产仔季序幕，8月21日野外引种大熊猫“乔乔”顺利产仔为产仔季画下圆满句号。中国大熊猫保护研究中心专家魏荣平介绍道：“今天亮相的大熊猫宝宝有10只，最大的是“博斯”仔7个月大，最小的是“张卡”仔5个月左右。没有来亮相的3只大熊猫宝宝中，有1只和妈妈一起，喊不出来。另外2只被选作大熊猫野化培训对象，目前和妈妈在核桃坪基地生活。亮相结束后，我们会把大熊猫宝宝送回妈妈身边，让妈妈继续哺育成长。春天即将来临，新一轮大熊猫繁育季又将开始了，让我们一起期待2023年的大熊猫宝宝吧。”
亮相现场。 李传有 摄长期以来，大熊猫以憨态可掬的外貌形态、独特的生态习性深受全球人民，特别是小朋友的喜爱，是家喻户晓的动物明星。为保护好这一珍贵物种，中国政府在上世纪五六十年代就开启了大熊猫保护之路。通过开展栖息地保护、加强立法、开展科学技术研究、强化国际国内合作交流等方式，中国大熊猫保护事业取得了举世瞩目的成就。人工繁育大熊猫数量持续增长，实现圈养大熊猫野化培训放归并成功融入野生种群，向世界生动讲述了以大熊猫为代表的野生动物保护的中国故事，为推动世界生物多样性保护贡献了中国智慧和中国方案。
据悉，大熊猫现在已经成为全球生物多样性保护的珍稀物种、旗舰物种和明星物种。中国大熊猫保护研究中心将坚持保护、研究并重，在持续巩固和深化大熊猫繁育研究等科技创新成果的基础上，聚力科技攻关、强化技术提升与应用，力争创造出更多成果，为一体推进大熊猫科研、监测和自然教育平台建设，支撑好大熊猫国家公园建设，推动人与自然和谐共生的现代化建设作出更大贡献。(完)
亮相现场。 李传有 摄
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
